The
Goal of High School Case Teaching
Case teaching engages the heart of an issue. As practiced in law, medical,
and business schools, the case is a real life challenge - and students
are responsible for applying knowledge from their field to decide, solve,
or somehow address a problem.
The purpose of this Initiative is to open a dialog between teachers,
administrators, and professors to review the civic mission of schools
and to test how case teaching can be implemented in high school history-social
science required core courses.
A feature piece of the case teaching method is the case discussion
where students are responsible for having read the case and know they
will be called upon to contribute to an analytical discussion. Students
are expected to listen to the comments of others in order to build upon
a point or to argue against an expressed opinion. They are expected
to cite specifics or evidence presented in the case. Most importantly,
the teacher will have selected the case based on its illustration of
complexity of major issues in the course. The case thus affords
an opportunity for students to apply concepts or theories, use analytical
tools, test assumptions, see relationships, and make connections - the
practice of critical thinking to construct deep understanding.
Objectives of Case Teaching
place responsibility/expectations on students for high-level analysis
enable that analysis through identification of guiding questions, frameworks,
tools
allow practice of analytical skills through reading, speaking, listening,
writing
The goal of project dialog is to identify guiding questions, frameworks,
and tools that promote skilled civic engagement in a global age. Topics
are integrated in the context of governance in an era of increasing
globalization and more complex impacts of technology. The case teaching
method, as a problem-solving approach to content, requires the teacher
to have a clear road map of course objectives with respect to relevance,
significance, precedence, relationships, or multiple perspectives. When
students are done with their World History semester that included coverage
of WWI, WWII, and the cold war, what should they know about causes of
war and security questions facing the world today? After senior semesters
of Government and Economics, what should high school graduates be able
to discuss regarding challenges to the American political-economy in
their lifetime?
The case teaching method, as piloted in this Initiative, is an adaptation
of the Pew Faculty Fellowship in International Affairs sponsored by
the Pew Charitable Trusts in the early 1990s at Harvard University's
Kennedy School of Government. Our lead
instructor, Professor Steven Lamy, was one of the three instructors
for the Pew Faculty Fellow program and brought the case teaching method
to the USC School of International Relations. A few of the pilot cases
in this project are adapted with permission from Georgetown University's
Institute for the Study of Diplomacy which now houses the Pew case collection.
CALIS has permission to adapt more cases - and teachers are welcome
to request a case they wish to adapt as part of this project.
A case is not always what we think of as a 'case study.' The case is
an actual historical event, but the case reading may be an article
from the newspaper or a primary source document, and is not always an
expository account. The best case is an excellent reading - accessible
and engaging. Teachers prepare students in advance of the case with
a framework by which to approach the issue and concepts. Students
prepare for a case discussion by "studying the case reading" - applying
the framework as a guide to identify controversies, causes, choices,
assertions, or assumptions.
Cases - as good stories - help students see the challenges or trade-offs
that faced the players involved in an historic or current event. There
are two types of cases:
"A retrospective or narrative case presents a comprehensive
history of a problem - complete with multiple actors, contending interests,
and the real outcome; students identify alternative options and analyze
why this outcome resulted, when other - possibly "better" solutions
- existed. A decision-forcing case stops short of revealing the
outcome, thus forcing students to identify and assess the range of possible
options for action. Typically, these cases have an "Epilogue," which
tells "the rest of the story"" again, students analyze why this was
what happened."*
There
are a variety of materials ready to jumpstart the process of classroom
implementation, but as highlighted in the name - and the key to case
teaching - is the teacher. Who would have guessed? Since we learn best
by doing, teachers in this Initiative are asked to dive in. It is a
developmental process. As we continue in Phase 2, there are many more
resources and lessons that have been created and implemented, but a
vast set of topics remain as well as the tasks of better sequencing,
overall integration and interdependence of issues, appropriateve assessments,
and the best guiding questions for students in today's high school social
science program.
While teachers will end up with "lesson plans" of how to use sample
project cases to help students analyze an issue, the goal of the project
is not simply to develop a collection of case teaching lesson plans.
More important is the dialog - to develop questions, frameworks, and
tools that address the core curriculum - and the modeling of a wide
variety of case readings and ability to build and guide a rich case
discussion around these vital questions and employing these analytical
tools. It is the case teaching method we wish to develop at the
high school level where teachers are equipped to engage students in
analytical reading, speaking, listening, and writing - whatever the
event, topic, or enduring social question.
* From
The ABCs of Case Teaching: Pew Case Studies in International Affairs
by Vicki Golich, Mark Boyer, Patrice Franko, Steven Lamy, published
by the Institute for the Study of Diplomacy, Edmund A. Walsh School
of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, 2000.