- Los Angeles Daily News
Friday, June 25, 1999
- LAUSD to continue bilingual classes
Beth Barrett
Despite many successes in English-only classes for non-native English-speaking
students in the first school year after Proposition 227, LAUSD officials plan to continue
offering classes in which teachers can use as much Spanish as they want.
Many principals, teachers and parents said English-only classes offered under the
"Model A" program have worked well.
But the district is embarking on the second year at an estimated cost of $30 million for
stipends to teachers in "Model B" classes using Spanish as a safety net without evidence
that the system has resulted in better student performance.
Proposition 227 was approved by voters last year in an effort to mandate English-only
instruction in California schools. But Los Angeles Unified School District officials
believe an apparent legal loophole in the wording -- that English immersion instruction
is "not normally" to exceed one year -- allows them the option of extending classes that
include Spanish assistance for tens of thousands of students next fall. "We're trying to
provide a bridge to a successful experience for students," said Forrest Ross, director of
the LAUSD's language acquisition branch and former Canoga Park Elementary School
principal.
"We don't intend to promote illegal activities. We're committed to the letter of the law,
and we're in support of proficiency in English for our students."
At the end of April, the LAUSD had 117,024 non-native English-speaking students in its
Model B program that allows Spanish explanations as teachers see fit -- 35,312 more
than it had in English-only classes for non-native English speakers.
The district moved about 25,000 students this year into mainstream English classes,
about the same rate as in prior years, Ross said. About 70,000 students have passed
English proficiency tests and are awaiting assignment to English-only classes.
Spanish was to end
Ron Unz, the Palo Alto software entrepreneur who authored Prop. 227, said that while
some flexibility was written into the measure, it was not intended to allow widespread
and continued instruction in Spanish. "If a lot of children aren't learning English after
one year, then it seems LAUSD may not be running a good program," Unz said. "It
shouldn't take much more than a year for most students, if that."
District board member David Tokofsky said the extension of the Spanish-explanation
classes represents a "failure in instructional leadership to focus on the fundamental
needs of the students, which is even more glaring in this uncharted territory."
The tier system's defenders say many Latino students coming out of Spanish-speaking
communities need another year of structured English to understand complex concepts.
"If you were to travel to a foreign county and were expected to learn a language in one
year, that would be very, very difficult for many children," said Fullbright Avenue
Elementary School Principal Margaret Espinosa Nelson.
All of the tiers are supposed to move students into English and other subjects in English
as quickly as possible. The LAUSD has not yet determined whether that's happening.
In practice, students in some Spanish classes are more likely to be taught by
emergency-credentialed instructors and to have less exposure to English instructional
materials, according to interviews with district officials, principals, teachers, parents
and students.
At Canoga Park Elementary School, for example, all eight emergency-credentialed
instructors teach the classes in which Spanish is allowed.
District officials acknowledge Model B textbooks are lacking. They say materials
appropriate to the tier have not been developed, adding oral instruction is emphasized
anyway.
"While reading and writing is required at every level, they may not have a reading text,"
Ross said.
When limited English-speaking kids do get hold of English books, however, they start
reading them along with their peers, said Sheryl Rosario, a first-grade teacher at
Canoga Park Elementary. "You can't hold them back."
Pressuring parents?
Tens of thousands of parents of Model B students last month received letters advising
them that in the "professional" opinion of school administrators, their children would
"benefit" from another year in the classes with Spanish help. The letters include the
caveat that the final decision, legally, is up to parents. But there is a wide discrepancy in
how principals present that decision to parents.
Nelson said she tells Fullbright Avenue parents that research shows children who get
support in their primary language build stronger academic foundations.
"It's important to invite students to embrace school," she said. "If we can do that with a
smile and a language they understand, it's the best way."
Laura Ortega said the programs have benefited her two sons -- Ricky, 10, a fourth
grader in the Model A English-only classes, and Eric, 6, a first-grader in Model B, both
at Fullbright.
Ortega of Canoga Park said Nelson initially asked her whether she spoke Spanish, which
she does. "Then she told me that if I wanted to help my son that I should put him in a
program where I could help him."
Initially, Ortega said she wanted Eric in a Model A English-only class as well but was
discouraged. "Many people have told me that the English-only program is better. But the
school told me the classes were filled, that there wasn't any space."
Of the 29 classes offered at Fullbright next fall, four are English-only for students
whose first language is English, with the remainder divided among models A and B.
Nelson denied children are ever placed without their parents' full consent.
Some parents said they felt pressure to choose a more bilingual setting for their
children.
Ramiro Ortiz of Winnetka said that after fighting to move his daughter out of a
traditional bilingual class at Fullbright a couple of years ago, he decided to lie on the
home language survey and to say he spoke English at home to make sure his son was not
put into a Model B class.
`I put English, English, English," he said, a request that was honored. "But they made me
lie, and I did lie. I'm not hurting anybody, and I'm helping my kid.
"My kids were born here, and I want their education to be in English. It's my job at home
to keep their culture for them."
Canoga Park Elementary School Principal Lorraine Mariglia said that of the 900
students with limited English proficiency this year, 58 have passed tests and are eligible
for placement in English-only classes -- about the same percentage as other schools
with a large structured English immersion program.
"The law says they'll learn English in a year, but I liken it to learning Russian,"
Mariglia said. "They can say learn it in a year, but that doesn't mean I would."
Little demand for Spanish help
At several other Valley elementary schools, principals said they had students with
limited English but no demand from parents for the Model B classes offering Spanish
help.
At Serrania Avenue Elementary School in Woodland Hills, where about 82 of the 720
students are not proficient in English, Principal Annette Star said only Model A English
only classes will be offered next fall.
The school never offered the Model B classes.
"We explain both of the programs to the parents, and most of them say, We want
English," Star said. "We want the one with the most English."
Teacher morale problems
Teachers who teach Model B -- English instruction with Spanish explanations -- next
year can expect to receive either the $5,000 stipend collectively bargained for bilingual
instructors or the $2,500 for instructors who pass a district language test, Tokofsky
said.
Meanwhile, most Model A English-only teachers will get only about $1,500 a year for
their credential under a rewards program that is being phased down, he added.
"We could be using that $30 million to give a 1 percent pay raise to all the teachers,"
Tokofsky said. "But there's a faction of people who would scream murder."
One instructor said she's concerned that the $5,000 stipend is "tied to the kids, tied to
their achievement and tied to passing them along."
The district will monitor for patterns that children are being held back inappropriately,
Ross said. District officials stand behind their decision to continue the program, saying
the demand is there from parents.
Ross said the district gets as many calls from parents who want less structured English
immersion for their children as he does from parents who want more. He also said the
waiver program that allows parents to put their children into a bilingual class has more
than doubled from 11,000 to 23,000.
"I hear the complaint that not enough primary language is being used in Model B," he
said.
- Los Angeles Daily News