- LOS ANGELES TIMES
Tuesday, September 28, 1999
- Ruling on Bilingual Ban Limits Waivers Parents
From Associated Press
SAN FRANCISCO--A state appeals court tightened California's voter-approved ban on
bilingual education Monday, ruling that only parents, not entire school districts, can ask
for exemptions from the law.
Proposition 227, which passed with 61% support and took effect last year, requires
students to be taught "overwhelmingly" in English.
But it allows parents and students to seek waivers that would allow them to remain in
bilingual classes and learn some subjects in their native language if their teachers and
schools approve. To qualify, the students must be older than 10 or have special needs.
In a lawsuit by the Oakland, Berkeley and Hayward districts, Alameda County Judge
Henry Needham ruled last year that the state board must consider districtwide requests
for Proposition 227 waivers.
Then-Gov. Pete Wilson said the decision could "eviscerate" the law.
The 1st District Court of Appeal disagreed with Needham, ruling 3-0 on Monday that the
intent of Proposition 227 was "that English instruction will be provided in all cases
except those where parental waivers are made."
A long-standing California law allows the state Board of Education to waive virtually any
statewide educational law at a district's request. But the appeals court said the
proposition could not be reconciled with such waivers.
Laura Schulkind, a lawyer for the districts seeking waivers, said the ruling is "not good
for kids.
"We . . . question the wisdom of making complex educational policy through an initiative
process where the electorate can be misinformed through ballot statements," she said.
- Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved