University of Southern California
Pulsed Power Research Group
Home About Research Personnel Publications Resources
Pulsed Power Combustion Applications Biological Applications
  • Transient Plasma Ignition
  • Streamer Physics and Diagnostics

Combustion Applications Research

Transient Plasma Ignition

Left: transient plasma with custom plug and 12ns generator. Right: Arc with spark plug and automobile ignition coil. Photo credit: Dan Singleton

Comparison of pressure traces between transient plasma ignition and traditional spark ignition in quiescent CH4-air mixture.

Left: transient plasma ignition flame front. Right: spark ignition flame front. Photo credit: Dan Singleton

Ignition delay comparison between two different transient plasma ignition systems and traditional spark ignition omn quiescent C2H4-air mixture.

Our work is an experimental study of non-equilibrium plasma in the transient, formative phase of an arc, applied to ignition and combustion. Transient plasma generated by nanosecond pulsed power as applied to ignition (henceforth called transient plasma ignition or TPI) has several advantages over traditional spark ignition, consistently demonstrating reductions in ignition delay, lean-burn capability, and the ability to ignite higher mass flow rates, resulting in improved efficiency and reduced emissions from a variety of airborne engines, as well as internal combustion engines.

The approach to transient plasma ignition is different from traditional approaches in that a short (typically < 100 ns) high-voltage pulse is used to initiate ignition, rather than a many microsecond to several milisecond high-voltage pulse for spark ignition. An arc from a traditional spark plug commonly used in both automobile and aircraft engines is an equilibrated (thermal) or nearly equilibrated plasma. Ignition is achieved by local heating of the gas, which increases the dissociation rate, and reactions of chain prolongation and development. In a non-equilibrated (transient) plasma, the ionization process is dominated by field-driven, energetic electrons impacting with "cold", non-excited atoms and molecules. Significant energy goes into creating highly energetic electrons instead of heating of the gas. An array of streamers (thin plasma channels) propagate across a gap by ionizing the gas in front of their charged heads. The streamers branch throughout the volume, rather than being concentrated at a single point like an arc, and have high energy electrons (up to 15 eV) in their heads. These electrons produce excited species through impact dissociation, excitation, and ionization of background gas molecules in the system, initiating combustion via electron impact, which is a more efficient and faster process than via traditional thermal methods.

To realize this technology, it is critical to both reduce the size, weight, and reliability of nanosecond pulsed power systems, and to understand the science of highly non-equilibrium energy states that occur between matter and energy. The focus of our research has been both engineering more compact and reliable TPI systems and applying them in experiments to improve the understanding of the physics of the process.

Contact: Dan Singleton, Scott Pendleton

Top

Streamer Discharge Physics and Diagnostics

Streamer discharge used for combustion applications. Photo credit: Dan Singleton

Comparison of experiment and calculation showing gas heating in Fast Ionization Wave discharge, a streamer-related low pressure discharge. The same measurement will be performed in streamers.

While TPI's effectiveness compared to spark gap and arc ignition has been shown in experimental tests, the mechanisms behind the improvements to combustion are not yet well understood. In order to optimize TPI for future applications, it is necessary to understand how it improves combustion so engines can be designed to maximize such mechanisms. Initially TPI was believed to be a purely volumetric effect; the streamers occupy more space than a regular spark gap. Recent experiments, however, have cast doubt on this by demonstrating that initiation of combustion is inhomogeneous throughout the volume and by showing reducing the size of the electrode gap does not proportionally reduce the improvements of TPI. Thus, an experimentally verified predictive kinetic model of TPI is necessary to understand its effect on combustion and to allow future optimization.

Developing an experimentally verified predictive kinetic model of TPI is a nontrivial task, posing many serious challenges. First, while many models of streamers have been developed, experimental verification has lagged behind computational and theoretical work. Thus, experimental work of streamer discharge alone is necessary in order to proceed. Current understanding of combustion is more complete, but the models are not optimized for the input of streamers and their products. Linking experiment to models poses another challenge: due to computing requirements both streamer and combustion kinetic models generally use zero-or one-dimensional regimes, requiring inherently two-or three-dimensional experiments to be modified in order to reduce relevant dimensions. In addition, time scales pose another complication; a kinetic model must take into account a very large temporal range from the nanoseconds for streamers all the way to the milliseconds for combustion.

Despite these challenges, a predictive kinetic model of TPI is possible. The processes involved in TPI can be broken down into three main stages separated in time: the streamers; the streamer products and their development; and the combustion. The purpose of this work is to measure the properties of the first two stages, providing an understanding of the kinetics leading up to combustion which can then later be input into existing combustion models.

Contact: Scott Pendleton, Dan Singleton

Top

©2010 USC Pulsed Power. All rights reserved.