|
|
 |
|
Photo by Carol Guzy, (c) 1999, the Washington Post. Reprinted with permission |
Issue: Spring 2005
The World According to Lamy
Was
intervention of Kosovo justified? By giving students an adaptable
framework, USC’s Steven Lamy teaches them to go beyond ideological
labels to assess conflicts contextually.
Professor
Steven Lamy has developed a tool for teaching IR that avoids loaded
political terms like “conservative” and “liberal,” while encouraging
students to analyze global affairs from multiple perspectives. He calls
his approach the Worldviews/ DEPPP (Describe, Explain, Predict,
Prescribe, Participate) model.
In Lamy’s framework,
political agents fall into three groups: Maintainers are
realist-pessimists who believe in the primacy of military and economic
power. Reformers place greater emphasis on cooperation,
alliance-building and diplomacy. Transformers believe in the force of
ideas and, rather than reacting to short-term issues, strive for
foundational change in societies, nations and the world community.
If they were playing a board game, maintainers would choose Risk.
Reformers would choose Pictionary, working in teams but making sure to
reshuffle the members frequently. Transformers might not even get
around to unwrapping the game; they would be asking why so much of our
social interaction is based on competition.
Students demonstrate they understand each worldview by accurately
DEPPP-ing it (Lamy’s verb). For example, a student might be asked to
“describe” a problem from a maintainer’s perspective; “explain” why
it’s a problem; “predict” the outcome; “prescribe” an action to resolve
it; and state how a country’s citizens should “participate” in the
process.
In one class exercise, Lamy asks: Was humanitarian intervention an appropriate response to the ethnic conflict in Kosovo?
The chart below, paraphrased and edited for space, presents the typical response under each Worldview.
|
|
Maintainer |
|
Reformer |
|
Transformer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Describe |
|
Civil
war is usually not a concern to outsiders. But the Kosovo conflict
threatened to increase instability in Europe and affect trade. |
|
A quick, decisive intervention was warranted to stop the genocide of ethnic Albanians by the Serbian-controlled government. |
|
The only long-term solution
is to replace our system of power politics with one focused on human security. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Explain |
|
This is an area of strategic importance. Instability here could spill over into NATO member states. |
|
Democratic nations and organizations such as the UN, EU and NATO are morally obliged to intervene. |
|
Human rights come before states’ rights. “National interest” needs to be redefined to stop genocide wherever it happens. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Predict |
|
Military intervention will teach Milosevic and others that ethnic cleansing is not acceptable. |
|
Stability and peace can only occur through the cooperative efforts of states and regional organizations. |
|
The problems of ethnic cleansing and nationalism cannot be solved by a failed world order that tolerates injustice. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Prescribe |
|
The major powers will use both carrots and sticks to change the government of Yugoslavia and punish those guilty of genocide. |
|
The EU, the UN and non-governmental organizations will help the new Kosovo government to establish a free society. |
|
The problem is bigger than Kosovo. The global community must address issues of inequality and repression in every country. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Participate |
|
Citizens should trust their leaders to take care of the problem in Kosovo. |
|
Citizens should make their positions known to public officials, and participate indirectly through NGOs. |
|
We are all part of a global community and should not feel that we have to participate solely through our governments. |
|