| (1) We first assure the correct calibration of the SOHO data by comparing it with the underflight data, which is then distribute to the relevant personnel so that the SOHO instruments calibration can be adjusted as necessary. (2) Secondly, the underflight data and available SOHO data is compared with an appropriate global semi-empirical collisional model (Shemansky and Smith, 1981) to improve our understanding of the physics, and the variability of the global solar atmosphere. This model differs substantially from existing proxy models that correlate ground based solar activity indices (such as solar microwave emissions) with the solar EUV emissions. Recently, there have been some evidence indicating that the 10.7 and at 21 cm emissions, widely used as proxies, are poorly correlated with both chromospheric, and transition region full disk solar EUV emissions (Neupert, 1993). We have therefore study other solar models in order to obtain a reliable method which can be used to investigate the mechanisms for solar EUV variability. |