January, 2003 

Home

Dean's Report

Administration Report

Our Community

Calendar



NEW OFFICE TO GAUGE SCHOOL’S PERFORMANCE

One of the principle challenges that confronted the School of Dentistry during the 2001 ADA accreditation site visit was establishing an outcomes assessment plan to qualitatively demonstrate our success in achieving the School of Dentistry’s established goals and objectives.

For those who were intimately involved in the outcomes effort, it was apparent that, while essential data existed, the process of collecting it from various offices and individuals, making it conform to the established goals and objectives, and utilizing it to make improvements was both cumbersome and inefficient.

Building upon and learning from that experience, the office of outcomes assessment was created in the fall of 2002. Headed by Eileen Suffet, executive director of academic affairs, the new office is charged with building a comprehensive assessment program based upon the School of Dentistry’s strategic plan and past outcomes efforts.

“Outcomes assessment is critically important to the success of our school.  It answers the questions, how well are we doing? are we achieving our goals? are we satisfied with our results and if not, how can we improve?” Suffet says.

Suffet is working with Larry Eisenberg, systems liaison specialist, to develop a process for collecting, storing and analyzing information regarding academic endeavors. Their work will focus on the four areas of the strategic plan: education and learning, innovation and discovery, service to the community and leadership. As measurable criteria are established and data is collected, each area will be evaluated and their findings will be reported to the executive management team.

“We hope to create a system that can produce evidence of accountability, encourage self-improvement, support on-going strategic planning, provide evidence of fiscal needs and encourage continuing reflection on our goals and objectives,” Suffet says.

Eisenberg has created numerous databases to collect and house outcomes data. While much work remains to be done, Eisenberg looks forward to having a system in place which will allow the comparison of data sets at different points in the school’s history.

“We’ve never had the ability to compare different points in time. How were we doing in 1987 as compared to today? It has never been complete. As our databases become more robust, we will be able to do that,” Eisenberg says.

Currently, the office of outcomes assessment has gathered qualitative data on student retention, personnel demographics and faculty evaluation. They hope to broaden their efforts to include clinical quality assurance in the near future. In the meantime, Suffet and Eisenberg will meet with faculty and staff who are responsible for ensuring the goals and objectives of the strategic plan are met.

“Outcomes assessment is not a new concept. Much of the data is already being collected. Our intention is simply to confirm that the objectives are indeed reasonable, that data can be used to measure these objectives, and how and when this data is collected,” Suffet says.

Back to Top