Full Court Press

Pathologist Michael Press is involved in an unrelenting scientific pursuit of the genetic links to women's cancers.

by Lori Oliwenstein

 

Michael Press, M.D., Ph.D., is on the phone, his voice calm and reassuring. He is talking to a physician whose patient, a woman with an aggressive case of breast cancer, is hoping to qualify for a clinical trial of a drug that seems to work best in women who have a specific gene mutation. Press, a professor of pathology at the Keck School of Medicine of USC and coordinator of the USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center's breast cancer research program, is acting as a sort of gatekeeper for the trial, analyzing cell sample after cell sample to ensure that only those women with the cell types most likely to respond to the drug in question
are admitted.

After assuring the physician that the results of the cell sample analysis should be available soon, Press hangs up the phone with a slight grimace. "It's hard," he admits. "There's so much at stake."


Press knows that the results of this trial may be critical in determining the future treatment of thousands of women with breast cancer. But he also knows that the results of this single cell typing are equally critical to the woman whose physician just called. It is difficult to balance these often-competing interests, but Press, a scientist with a physician's gift for compassion and empathy, does it almost effortlessly.


And it shows. In 1998, Press was awarded the Harold E. Lee Chair in Cancer Research, part of a $5 million gift from philanthropist Henrietta C. Lee in honor of her late husband. Peter Jones, Sc.D., director of the USC/Norris Cancer Center, calls Press "the Norris' leading basic scientist in the study of the molecular and genetic causes of breast and ovarian cancer." In October of this year, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation-which supports some of his ongoing clinical research-honored him at its Seventh Annual Symposium and Awards Luncheon.


"I've always been fascinated with trying to understand why one person becomes ill and another doesn't, or why one person's disease progresses and another's doesn't," he says. "That's what led me to pathology."


Gone fishing
And pathology has led him to the scientific pursuit of a number of genetic links to women's cancers. One of the longest of these quests has centered on a gene for a protein called HER2/neu.


The HER2/neu protein is a cell-surface receptor that plays a role in sending growth signals to the cell's nucleus. When this gene is overexpressed-prompting the production of several times the normal number of receptors-the cells carrying that gene tend to grow faster than usual. As it turns out, HER2/neu is overexpressed in 25 to 30 percent of human breast cancers, making them unusually aggressive and more likely to metastasize and recur.


Press is involved in HER2/neu research in a number of different ways. For one, there is that clinical trial the concerned doctor was calling about-a trial under the auspices of the Breast Cancer International Research Group (BCIRG) that hopes to determine whether the drug herceptin-a monoclonal antibody that grabs onto the HER2/neu protein receptor and prevents its signal from being sent-is truly the best way to treat newly-diagnosed breast cancers that overexpress the gene. Press' lab is the international testing site for that trial-the laboratory through which samples from all over the world are routed, and where it is determined whether the breast cells in those samples actually overexpress HER2/neu. To date, says Press, they have screened more than 2,000 patients' cancers.


"We're excited about being part of this trial," he says. "I really think it will improve our approach to breast cancer therapy."


The Press laboratory was chosen as the testing site for the trial because Press and his colleagues were recently involved in getting one of the most accurate methods to characterize these sorts of cell-surface receptors that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration-a process called fluorescence in-situ hybridization, or FISH. "Although most places don't use FISH as yet," says Press, "when it comes to gene amplification and overexpression, this is the way to go." Clearly, the BCIRG agrees.


So do a number of other researchers, both within the Keck School and outside. For instance, Press is currently collaborating with Leslie Bernstein, Ph.D., the AFLAC Chair in Cancer Research and professor of preventive medicine at the Keck School, in a study of about 1,500 women with invasive breast cancer as part of the large-scale Women's Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences Study (CARE). Together, they are examining a number of different genes and hormones that might play a role in making one individual's cancer more belligerent than another's. And, along with Shelley Enger, an epidemiologist from Kaiser Permanente, Press is working to characterize breast cancer's cellular and genetic alterations, and determine whether those changes can be linked to either positive or negative responses to various chemotherapy drugs.


"We're looking to see if we can show a correlation between genetic alterations and a patient's potential for responding to the different forms of therapy," says Press. "I've been involved in this for quite a while."


Cell behavior
Press is equally involved in pursuing basic scientific questions-what he calls "the really exciting stuff"-such as determining precisely why an overexpressed HER2/neu gene makes tumor cells so aggressive and dangerous. To do that, Press has engineered HER2/neu overexpressing cells in laboratory dishes, and is finding that overexpression of the gene has an impact on some of the cell's most basic processes, like the ways in which cells adhere to various tissues in the body.
"Cells that overexpress HER2/neu actually adhere less tightly to the tissues," he says. "Which makes sense if you realize that in order to metastasize, a cell needs to be able to move more easily. HER2/neu seems to permit the cell to do this."


Press has also found that a revved-up version of HER2/neu can make it easier for cancer cells to migrate from place to place and to invade new tissues. And from preliminary studies, he says, it looks as if too much HER2/neu also decreases apoptosis-the cellular version of suicide.


"The goal is to try to understand what HER2/neu does to cells to change those behaviors," Press says. "Then, once we know the steps, we can see if we can intervene-and where."


Inherited cancer
The story of breast cancer, and of Press' pursuit of a cure, neither begins nor ends with HER2/neu. When Press was at the University of Chicago-where he received a Ph.D. in cell biology in 1975 and an M.D. in 1977-he actually entered the breast cancer arena studying the estrogen receptors in the nucleus of women's cells. "We would look at estrogen receptors in the clinical setting to determine who to treat with hormones-and who not," he explains. (Breast cancer cells that sport these receptors are more likely to proliferate out of control in response to female hormones; cancers without the receptors can be more safely treated with hormones.)


In the mid- to late-1980s, Press became intrigued by work in the laboratory of Dennis Slamon, M.D., Ph.D., at the University of California, Los Angeles. Slamon was one of the first researchers in the country to study HER2/neu, and Press wanted to be part of that groundbreaking work. So, in 1987, he took a sabbatical from his position as associate professor at the University of Chicago, and headed to Los Angeles; when the sabbatical was over, he accepted a job offer at USC. "I really liked the department here," he says simply.


Once ensconced at the USC/Norris Cancer Center, Press resurrected his interest in estrogen receptors and breast cancer. Quickly, he began to realize that estrogen alone is only part of the equation. "The estrogen receptor's function is to recognize the presence of the hormone and cause other genes to be turned on in the cell," he says. "But they don't do it alone. They require co-activators-other enzymes and proteins that make the expression of the estrogen receptor much stronger." To pursue this area, Press collaborated with Michael Stallcup, Ph.D., Keck School professor of pathology and a leading scientist in the study of steroid hormone receptor co-activators.


Among those co-activators is one of the genes that is considered responsible for the inherited forms of breast cancer-BRCA1. Mutated BRCA1 is linked to about 10 percent of breast cancers; women with the mutated gene have an extremely high risk of developing breast cancer relative to women who lack the mutation.


But Press believes that is not the entire story of BRCA1 and breast cancer. "We assume that it not only has a role in hereditary cancers, but also a role in breast cancers that are not hereditary," he says.


That is why Press' laboratory is looking into the role of "wild type" BRCA1-the non-mutated version of the gene. And what they have found is that women with non-hereditary breast cancers tend to have a reduced or a complete loss of expression of the BRCA1 gene. In other words, the
non-mutated BRCA1 seems to play a role in controlling the expression of growth signals in cells. When paired with estrogen and other hormone receptors, says Press, wild type BRCA1 may play a more critical role in spontaneous breast cancers than it does in its mutated form in inherited breast cancer. And that, he adds, may lead to new therapeutic options for women with the disease.

That sort of thinking is typical of Press. When he investigates a potential breast cancer culprit-HER2/neu, estrogen receptor status, the BRCA1 gene or other proteins and genes that are postulated to play a role in the disease-he never forgets that his job is to help bring findings from the laboratory to a patient's bedside. "We're very interested in translational medicine at the Norris," notes Press. "It's the logical next step when you're doing any phase of cancer research."

 


Back
Next
Index