USC HomeUSC Home







“The Case for Change in College Admissions”

For the Conference Blog, please click on the dates below:

"The Case for Change in College Admissions" brought together the nation’s finest thinkers, scholars, enrollment practitioners and educational policymakers to discuss what is right about selective college admissions, what is wrong, and collectively formulate a framework for changing college admissions to better serve the public interest and meet the nation’s attainment goals.

PROGRAM GUIDE

-"The Case for Change in College Admissions" Program Guide

PARTICIPANT LIST

-"The Case for Change in College Admissions" Participant List

A PURPOSEFUL MEETING

In partnership with the Education Conservancy and through the generous support of the College Board, the Lumina Foundation, and the Spencer Foundation, the USC Center for Enrollment Research, Policy, and Practice hosted, “The Case for Change in College Admissions,” in Los Angeles from January 26-28, 2011. 

This was neither conference nor symposium.  Instead it was a purposeful meeting of 185 prominent scholars, policymakers, college leaders, and admission practitioners to discuss what is right about college admissions at class-crafting institutions, to identify what is wrong, and to collectively formulate a framework for changing college admissions to better serve the public interest and meet the nation¹s attainment goals.

This gathering was dynamic in process, and its outcomes consequential. Participants actively learned about the current state of our admissions system from one another and from our distinguished speakers through a variety of presentation and discussion formats. Keynote speakers included Andrew Delbanco, Robert Zemsky, Michael McPherson, Sandy Baum, Harry Brighouse and Roberto Rodriguez. Moreover, this event harvested knowledge and expertise that informed the creation of a summary document outlining specific admissions areas in need of change. In addition to highlighting well-crafted arguments for change that include social, political and economic levers, this document also identifies individual, collective, legal, and leadership considerations that lie at the heart of a reform agenda. This important document, which is being distributed among educational scholars, practitioners, and policymakers nationwide, will help to maximize the impact of the meeting and move the nation toward necessary college admissions reform in the social interest.

AGENDA

Presentations and Sessions:

-College Admissions: Do We Do What We Say We Do?
-Defining Our Collective Charge
-The Case for Change from the Perspectives of Educational Scholars: What We Do, Why, and With What Results
-The Social Purpose of Sorting: An Economic Case
-Ethical Exigencies and Opportunities: The Space for Moral Action
-Why America Cannot Wait for Change in College Admissions
-Laying the Framework for Change in College Admissions: The Perspective of Enrollment Professionals
-Laying the Framework for Change in College Admissions: Individual, Collective, Legal and Leadership Considerations
-Next Steps in Developing an Action Plan for Change

Keynote Speakers:

Andrew Delbanco, Columbia University
Sandy Baum, Skidmore College
Harry Brighouse, University of Wisconsin
Jerry Lucido, University of Southern California
Michael McPherson, Spencer Foundation
Roberto Rodriguez, White House Education Advisor
Lloyd Thacker, Education Conservancy
Robert Zemsky, University of Pennsylvania

Panelists:

Philip Ballinger, University of Washington
Anthony Carnevale, Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce
Arlene Wesley Cash, Spelman College
Art Coleman, EducationCounsel LLC
Susan Dynarski, University of Michigan
Bill Fitzsimmons, Harvard University
Matthew Reed, The Institute for College Access & Success
John Slaughter, President Emeritus, Occidental College and the University of Maryland
Joyce Smith, NACAC
Joseph Soares, Wake Forest University
Bill Tierney, University of Southern California
Susan Wilbur, University of California

AVAILABLE POWERPOINT SLIDES

Harry Brighouse - Ethical Exigencies and Opportunities: The Space for Moral Action

Art Coleman - A Central Element in the Framework for Change in College Admissions: The Process of Policy Change

Susan Dynarski - The Case for Change in College Admissions: Considering the Strategic Use of Aid

Michael McPherson and Sandy Baum - Sorting to Extremes: An Economic Analysis

Matthew Reed - Opportunities for Change in Colleges' Financial Aid Policies

Joseph Soares - Merit and Social Selection: From Social Disparities by Design to Social Disparities by Default

Bill Tierney - The Class of 2023

RELATED READING MATERIALS

10 Myths About Legacy Preferences in College Admissions by Richard Kahlenberg, Chronicle of Higher Education

A 21st Century Imperative: Promoting Access and Diversity in Higher Education by Arthur Coleman et al.

A First Look at Net Price Data - The Institute for College Access and Success

Application Inflation: When Is Enough Enough? by Eric Hoover, Chronicle of Higher Education

Breaking the 'Cruel Cycle of Selectivity' in Admissions by Jerry Lucido

College Admissions: What Are Students Learning? - Executive Summary by Lloyd Thacker

Education Our Leaders: Speaking Truth to Power (Appropriately and Well) by Jerry Lucido

Enrollment Management, Inc.: External Influences on Our Practice by Scott Andrew Schulz and Jerry Lucido

Is the College Admissions Process Too Obsessed with Rankings, Test Scores, and Prestige? by Lloyd Thacker

Open Letter to Faculty on Wake Forest's New Admissions Policy with Annotated Bibliography by Joseph Soares

Recommendations for Award Letters - The Institute for College Access and Success

Reflections on the Topic of Transparency by Philip Ballinger

Remarks by the President on Higher Education and the Economy

Restoring America's Leadership in Higher Education by Roberto Rodriguez

Taking Fairness Seriously by Sandy Baum

The College Idea by Andrew Delbanco

The Power of Privilege: Yale and America's Elite Colleges by Joseph Soares

Time to Reexamine Institutional Cooperation on Financial Aid by Matthew Reed and Robert Shireman

Tobi's Lament by Robert Zemsky and Gregory Wegner

Two-Sided Matching by Charlie Kurose

ADDITIONAL CITATIONS:

Ballinger, P. (2007). "Why and How Socio-Economic Factors Should Be Used in Selective College Admissions." In T. Crady and J. Sumner (Eds.), Key Issues in Enrollment: New Directions in Student Services. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

MEDIA COVERAGE AND RELATED ARTICLES

"Expanding Enrollment at Selective Colleges: What is the Point?" - Michael McPherson and Sandy Baum - Chronicle of Higher Education (2/6/11)

"Plea to Expand Enrollment at Top Colleges" - Jacques Steinberg - The New York Times (2/3/11)

"College Admissions Officers Make a Case for Change" - USC News (2/1/11)

"Admissions Officials Do Some Soul-Searching" - Eric Hoover, Chronicle of Higher Education (1/30/11)